What is confirmed
There is no supportable named ranking from the current roster evidence.
- ✓ Players can spin for Party Items.
- ✓ Party Items are part of the decorate-and-grow party loop described by the creator.
A trustworthy tier list cannot be produced from the evidence currently available. This page documents the missing inputs, confidence standard, and repeatable comparison method without publishing fake S, A, or B ranks.
Make a Party tier list status: no trustworthy item ranking can be produced because the public roster and comparable effects are unavailable.
There is no supportable named ranking from the current roster evidence.
The Cash values drawn into promotional cover art are not a complete roster or repeatable measurement set, so they are excluded.
Hold other variables steady and change one item or setup decision at a time. These checks create observations; they do not turn a local sample into an official probability or global tier.
Record the Cash/sec shown before and after one change.
Use the current in-game price or resource cost, not a remembered value.
Compare how long each setup takes to reach the same Cash target.
Note placement, base space, interaction, or other constraints you actually observe.
Repeat the check in the same game version before treating one result as a pattern.
Each row separates what is known from the exact condition that would make the current roster comparable.
Limitations: the current roster, item effects, spin model, and same-version comparisons remain incomplete.
Use the Spin Log for labels you observe, the Cash tools for one measured baseline, and the Party Item archive for the current evidence boundary.
No creator-published Party Item roster, effect table, spin odds, or pity rules were added to the checked official surfaces. The ranking hold remains unchanged.
A complete roster, repeatable effects, odds, costs, and same-version comparisons were not available from checked official sources.
No. Promotional artwork is not a complete or repeatable data source for an item ranking.
Canonical item names, verified effects, comparable costs, and repeated same-version observations are needed before publishing ranks.
Record observed Cash-per-second changes, costs, time-to-goal, placement constraints, and repeated results. The Party Planner and Spin Log can organize those observations.